CPA Exam Lab
All patterns
Practice, ethics, and professional duties

The Accountant Liability Test

Two questions decide it: how far the negligence standard reaches, and which securities act sets the plaintiff's burden.

How the exam words it

The playbook

  1. 1For ordinary negligence, place the plaintiff on the ladder: Ultramares (privity or near-privity only), the Restatement (a known, foreseen class, the majority view), or reasonable foreseeability (any foreseeable user, the minority view).
  2. 2For fraud or gross negligence, every state reaches all reasonably foreseeable users.
  3. 3Under section 11 of the 1933 Act the plaintiff proves only a material misstatement and damages, and the accountant must prove the due-diligence defense; under Rule 10b-5 of the 1934 Act the plaintiff must also prove reliance and scienter.
  4. 4Working papers belong to the accountant subject to client confidentiality, and the section 7525 privilege covers only non-criminal federal tax advice, not criminal cases, tax-shelter promotion, or state matters.

The trap

Letting an unknown third party recover for ordinary negligence in a privity state, or requiring a section 11 plaintiff to prove reliance and negligence. Privity blocks the negligence claim; section 11 shifts the burden to the accountant.

How the exam varies it

The same pattern, re-skinned along these axes:

Which negligence standard: privity, foreseen user, or foreseeabilityNegligence versus fraud or gross negligence1933 Act section 11 versus 1934 Act Rule 10b-5, and privilege versus working-paper ownership

Drill this pattern

8 questions of The Accountant Liability Test from across the AUD topics. Clear it by getting 5 right with a streak of 3.

Shows up in 1 REG topic